While all of the examples of
flawed prose that I give on this blog are taken from manuscripts that I have
edited, I generally swap out significant words and make other alterations as
necessary to ensure that none of the examples could be identified as coming
from a specific work. The form of the sentence (and thus its flaws) are intact
and still useful, but I have no desire to single out or cast aspersions on any
specific authors.
Today, however, is an
exception. The examples will be unaltered from their original form and I will
identify the author . . . because the author was me. Yeah. While going over a
short story that I wrote a while back, I came across this persistently-repeated
problem, one that I have corrected in numerous manuscripts but which still
managed to crop up in my own writing.
This problem is the phrase “for
a moment” and several similar words and phrases that indicate that an action or
event lasted for only a brief duration. Not every instance of this phrase will
be bad, but look at these examples:
For a
moment, the wolf was silent and motionless. Then it began to growl softly.
Vanya
froze, staring at the bird. After a moment, it pulled its head from beneath its
wing, revealing its shining jet-black eyes and beak.
Vanya
considered the offer briefly. “All right, I’ll get you some fruit.”
The king studied Vanya for a moment with a bushy eyebrow
raised. Then he shook his head.
The
wolf seemed to consider the matter for a moment and then shrugged its shoulders
slightly.
For a
moment, he thought that he saw a figure in the shadows of the draw, but it was
gone when he tried to look closer.
In each of these examples, the phrase “for a
moment” and its variations are redundant. They either describe an action that
is normally momentary by nature or they explain that an action is momentary
when the fact that the action is followed by another action already implies
that. Look at each of those examples again with the “for a moment” removed.
The
wolf was silent and motionless. Then it began to growl softly.
Vanya
froze, staring at the bird. It pulled its head from beneath its wing, revealing
its shining jet-black eyes and beak.
Vanya
considered the offer. “All right, I’ll get you some fruit.”
The king studied Vanya with a bushy eyebrow raised. Then he
shook his head.
The
wolf seemed to consider the matter and then shrugged its shoulders slightly.
He thought that he saw a figure in the shadows of the draw,
but it was gone when he tried to look closer.
See how much stronger those
become without “for a moment”? Wherever possible, remove this and similar
phrases from your writing.
Note that “for a moment” isn’t
always bad—sometimes, it’s simply the best way to indicate an action’s
duration. Here’s some uses of it from the same story that weren’t so bad:
Vanya didn’t believe for a moment that the fox had magical
powers of any sort.
The
firebird looked surprised and then suspicious, but after a moment it began to
devour the fruit with delight.
In the first example, the use of “for a moment”
is justified by it being used in a very common phrase—“he didn’t believe for a
moment that . . .”
In the second example, the
phrase adds a beat to the sentence, a pause between the firebird’s being
suspicious and its beginning to eat the fruit, that would not remain if the
phrase were removed. The pause is important because it gives a realistic pacing
to the firebird’s mood shifts and actions, and so the phrase is justified.
Go ahead and search through
your manuscripts for the words “moment” and “briefly.” Try removing each
instance of these words; if the sentence still reads smoothly without them,
then they were redundant and should probably be removed.
No comments:
Post a Comment