Just what is an infinitive, and how does one split it? The
answer is pretty simple: an infinitive is the basic, unconjugated form of a
verb. In English, infinitives take the form of “to ____.” To
read, to run, to imagine. From this basic infinitive, the verb can be
transformed to meet many needs of speech:
I eat.
She eats.
They ate.
We’re eating.
You should have
eaten.
There are many other forms a verb can take—all of them drop
the “to” from the infinitive form of the verb and then alter the primary word
to suit the context of the sentence. But that basic “to ____” form is the
starting point.
So, how do you split the infinitive form of a verb? Simple.
You just place an adverb between the “to” and the rest of the verb:
She wanted to
furiously pound his face in.
You may have had an English teacher at some point who
considered splitting infinitives to be the eighth deadly sin—an unforgivable perversion
of the language. It’s really not, though it is
something that you should do only infrequently.
Why is splitting the infinitive considered so bad? Well, to
answer that we need to delve a bit into (a simplified version of) the history
of the language.
A Simplified History of English
A long time ago, out there in Europe, Latin was considered
the crème de la crème of languages. Most European languages had evolved out of
Latin, and it was generally considered the “holy” language of academics and the
church. The language that would eventually come to be known as English,
meanwhile, was a young hodgepodge of barbarian speech and “proper” languages—the
bastard child of a dozen different parents. It lacked a consistent grammatical
structure and written form.
However, a number of scholars who spoke this proto-English
were beginning to appear, and they wanted to make their language a respectable
equal with all of those other European languages. They set about to codify and
clarify the rules of the language, and found a large amount of gaps where there
were no consistent rules to English. Whenever that happened, they simply
borrowed rules from the most respectable language around: Latin.
Why was this a problem? Well, here’s the infinitive form of
the verb “to read” in Latin: legere. Notice how it differs from the English
version—it’s only one word. So because it is literally impossible to split an
infinitive in Latin, it was decided that it wouldn’t be allowed in English,
either.
Back to the Present Day
Doesn’t that seem a little silly nowadays? We’re refusing to
make use of a relatively unique ability of our language because a once-popular
language couldn’t split an infinitive. Well, I don’t hold to that. There are
times when you just need to split an infinitive, dang it! For instance:
That’s probably the most famous split infinitive around.
Sure, they didn’t have to split the
infinitive, but try re-writing that line without it:
Boldy to go where
no one has gone before.
To go boldly
where no one has gone before.
To go where no
one has gone before.
None of those rewrites have the same power as the
original, do they? “To boldly go” is simply the most powerful and moving way to
write that sentence. Split infinitives for the win!
However . . .
The potential power of split infinitives notwithstanding,
you shouldn’t be using them often. Most of the time, split infinitives simply
sound awkward and forced—adverbs are already difficult enough to use well on their own, after all. Compare this sentence that uses a split infinitive:
He needed to quickly
devour his meal.
to this sentence that does not:
He needed to
devour his meal quickly.
The second one is stronger—it just feels more natural and
smooth. Most of the time, your writing will be better off if you avoid
splitting infinitives. Just remember, though, that it is an option. The day may come when a split infinitive will
strengthen your writing, so know what you’re doing when that time comes.
Thanks! It really helped me to be able to identify this!
ReplyDelete